Let the Buyer Beware
In this short letter we're going to reduce the issue of election integrity/security down to its simplest terms.
Nebraska Salesman of State Bob Evnen sold We the People an alleged election integrity management system, to the tune of tens of millions of our hard earned dollars.
In doing so, he hijacked and centralized our county elections into the arms of a private company with competing interests.
The contract for this alleged election integrity system has a no-accountability-to-We-the-People clause (that AG Doug Peterson signed off on it).
So what did We the People get for our hard earned money? Did we get a guarantee of election integrity?
Not at all. Do you get a receipt that ties your name to your ballot? No. Did you get a receipt that tells you how you voted…not just that you voted, but how? In other words, who you voted for? No. Do you have access to the names of those who voted? No. Do you have a way to audit the election results? No.
If you can't know that your vote was/is secure, that is, that it was counted/tabulated the way you cast it, and not diluted by illegal voting, how can you know that the overall election was secure? You can’t.
As I’ve said many times, voting machines are easily hackable. Ask any good IT guy. Also, tabulators can be easily abused. People are corruptible, and if/when they become corrupt, they will engage in all kinds of election shenanigans.
Bob Evnen, on the other hand, assures us that our elections are "fair and secure." (How he can say this with a straight face, without providing us, or himself, with any real checks and balances, or evidence, is any one’s guess.) He has a conflict of interest in saying this. His name is on the line. His reputation is on the line. His livelihood (and possibly his freedom) are on the line.
The fact is, our elections are not fair and secure. If they were, they would provide the evidence. The fact that Democrats love the way Evnen runs our elections should be a red flag.
So what are we going to do? We can't let him continue to get away with this.
We need checks and balances. We need receipts. We need a process anyone can monitor and audit.
Bob Evnen admits of bad actors and of fraud that "works,” but he won't allow any independent inspections of our election machines. Nor will the machine manufacturer.
Why not? What are they afraid of? What do they have to hide?
Bob's method of conducting our elections is wide open to fraud, given his system of mass mail-in and unmanned/unmonitored drop box voting. He admits this.
When Bob Evnen says our elections are fair and secure, he is doing nothing less than participating in a nationwide government propaganda campaign that was planned well in advance of November 3rd.
Also see this official government agency website (cisa.gov)…be sure to note the date and the corporate sponsorship:
WASHINGTON – The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, ... Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software) ... - released the following statement:
“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
The "most secure in American history"?? When they are "reviewing and double-checking"?? That is laughable. Anytime you see propaganda like this, you know something is wrong. You know they are trying to hide something.
As I write, CISA is fighting against disclosure of an election machine vulnerability report by voting technology expert Alex Halderman. As I write! What are they afraid of, if they are so certain we had the most secure election in history? They aren’t certain. It's all lies.
You can't reconcile the inconsistencies with the mantra that "[t]he November 3rd election was the most secure in American history." It can only be propaganda.
Propaganda is prima facie evidence of fascism (which we've seen plenty of, these past two years, between the plandemic and the election):
Quoting from Prussiagate:
"Fascism behaves similar to [the alleged virus]. It infects its host nation by a process of mass psychosis of its citizens – through a media campaign of fear and paranoia, the decay of moral values, and the creep of socialist principles of Big Government solutions but outsourced to Big Corporate partners. Its citizens are mobilized to hate and vilify the enemy (a minority part of the population), while the Government sets about stripping its nation of all of its wealth into protected Corporations."
"Repeating something is a psychological weapon used in psychological mass manipulation."
A person can’t say that they know something when it’s impossible for them to know it, not without lying. Evnen sold us a "bill of goods." Your vote isn't secure, because you have no receipts, no security cameras, no public audits and no real checks and balances.
Let the Buyer Beware. The burden of due diligence is on the buyer. It is the buyer’s responsibility to be sure they are not being cheated.
Robert J. Borer