top of page
  • Robert J. Borer

Facebook Live Q&A w/ Bob & Dr. Douglas Frank

Updated: Apr 27, 2022

Dr. Douglas Frank and Robert Borer have a candid conversation via Zoom on Facebook Live.

About Dr. Frank

Dr. Douglas G. Frank is a 40-year modeler of pandemics and elections, a renowned scientist, and inventor who received his PhD in Electrochemistry at UC Santa Barbara. He has authored approximately sixty peer-reviewed scientific reports, including feature and cover articles in the leading scientific journals in the world (Science, Nature, Naturwissenschaften).

Dr. Frank built upon Kurt Hyde’s theory from 2010 that suggested that US Census data could be used to artificially inflate voter registration databases across the country. He further asserted that voter registration databases were indeed inflated during the 2020 General Election and that, using an algorithm that he theorizes was developed at the state level and applied to the voter registration information in each individual county in a state, the voter turnout of the election was predictable to an unusually high level of accuracy.

Using 2010 US Census data and updated 2019 American Community Survey data from the Census Bureau, Dr. Frank is able to predict not only the voter turnout by age, but voter registration by age. When Frank’s prediction is compared to the actual voter turnout and voter registration by age, it correlates to an unusually high level of accuracy.

Nebraska Election Analysis

The following presentation shows Dr. Doug Frank’s analysis of the 2020 election data in Nebraska.

Pay particular attention to:

  • Counties where the percent of population registered to vote is higher than 95%. This may simply be poor administration in not removing old voters from the rolls, or it may provide some indication of counties where “phantom” voters were been added to the rolls for the purpose of submitting fraudulent votes. These deserve deeper investigation.

  • How accurately Dr. Frank was able to predict the voting turnout based on the census data and applying his algorithm (as shown by the “R=” correlation coefficient and visualized on the charts in red and pale blue lines). Very high numbers above 0.95 may indicate some form of algorithmic manipulation of votes.

The following video shows the charts for each county (slides only, no audio):

July 30, 2021. A similar presentation in NE was recorded here.

Other points to note:

  • Sometimes the ballot count numbers and voter registration numbers used by Dr. Frank differ from other official sources. This appears to be because in these comparisons, Dr. Frank takes the number of voters from the state’s voter rolls (or “voter history file”) rather than the official number of votes. In a number of states these numbers do not reconcile accurately, an indicator of poorly administered voter rolls. See Dr. Frank’s mention of this issue, and take this into account with your comparisons.

  • Many states also demonstrate poor clean-up of their voter rolls, where voters that have died or moved interstate are left on the rolls for extended periods of time. This might explain some of the high numbers of registered voters vs residents, including instances where this is over 100%. Although it appears fraudulent at first glance, some of this might simply be poor administration. It definitely deserves a deeper look, however.

Registrants and Voters by County

The below charts compare the official election report (dated Dec 4th, 2020) with the voter rolls on Dec 4th for each county. In a properly run election there should be zero differences between the two records. But as you can see many hundreds of anomalies exist.

The red bars show the number of ballots that were tallied, but not assigned to voters in the rolls. The black bars show the number of registrants added or removed from each county’s rolls.

This second chart shows the same data but amplified by a factor of ten to see the differences more clearly.

The top ten worst counties on this chart were:

  1. Cass

  2. Douglas

  3. Platte

  4. Lancaster

  5. Thurston

  6. Adams

  7. Lincoln

  8. Hall

  9. Sarpy

  10. Dodge

Source: Dr Doug Frank,

Voter Registration & Turnout Compared to Other States

Source: Telegram Post, Nov 28, 2021

Further Update

Written Reports

Video Presentations

  • The simplest possible explanation of his findings is covered in this 3min video clip A Simple Metaphor.

  • A more detailed overview of Dr. Frank’s work can be seen in his 1-hour interview with Mike Lindell, Scientific Proof.

  • He also presented his findings at Lindell’s Cyber Symposium, Aug 10–12, 2021.

Other Presentations


An independent researcher demonstrated Dr. Frank’s process and statistics and how he was able to replicate the findings. Watch the video here.

29 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Dear Senator (AG-elect), I hope this letter finds you well and in good spirits. I'm writing in regard to our "elections." I strongly recommend you read this short document in its entirety (not at the

Letter from Chairman Eric Underwood Nov 7, 2022 In a typical election cycle the question is asked…Who are you going to vote for? Seems like a simple question. It is more of a loaded question, but it i

We the People October 2022 The unanimous Declaration of united Patriots across Nebraska, The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle Us to Freedom, from All tyranny. We are All created equal. We ar

bottom of page